![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() PCI and PCI-E is located inside the computer or dock, too noisy an environment for analogue circuitry, and runs of the crappy computer power supply. USB 3.0 is full duplex, still has a bit over overhead though.įirewire is full duplex, and has very low overhead, but is very expensive, sometimes tricky to get to work at all, and about to be phased out. Sure, USB (1 or 2.0 don't matter it's half duplex and everything) is a bit slow, if you plan on using it with a CPU slower then 1GHz and expect to stream 24/96 audio. The reason you want this and not some external USB thing is that this will save you on money, cable clutter, software settings and CPU load (USB is about the worst interface there is on that part). It's nothing fancy but it sure isn't crappy either.ĭo you know a way of using the Displayport to connect to my receiver? My System is a CAT Berlin 2059 hooked up to a Technics receiver. Let's be honest, TV speakers don't really compare, so it's no surprise I didn't hear any difference. If it sound crappy that way, you got crappy audio equipment. You want a signal that is as unprocessed as possible, if it's 44.1KHz 16bit audio, you want your computer to play it at 44.1KHz 16bit, so use WASAPI or ASIO whenever possible, NO DSP's. Of cause, if windows is configured with all sorts of resampling, loudness and what not, everything will sound bad no matter what. analogue out form the laptop, then the DAC in your TV or whatever, is as crappy as the one in the laptop, or maybe the speakers or amp is too colored to show the difference. If you don't hear an improvement from displayport vs. The displayport does not output analogue sound, so the DAC in the device it feeds in to, will produce the sound. BTW, my T500 from the same generation is also much better than my X220, but slightly worse than my X301. I can understand if you don't receive a good sound card with your notebook, but the X220 was a joke.Ĭurrently, MacBooks have pretty decent sound cards, they are comparable to my X301. I have already sold my X220 because something like this is just unacceptable. When listening to music on good speakers all filters should be turned off for the best results. That is basically what I did with my X220. This will make the card sound average rather then terrible. Go to the "enhancements" tab and disable stuff like bass boost and loudness, you may even want to disable all enhancements, but that will cause low volume. I'm curious if anyone here as tried any other approaches to improve the audio quality on this machine? Thanks for any feedback.Īdda wrote:I got best results from my W510, by disabling all SmartAudio functionality.Īlso go to the sound configuration menu in the control panel, select the smartaudio card in the "playback" tab and click properties. I read through this thread on the Lenovo support forums and tried installing Dolby Home Theatre software, which doesn't seem to help much with sound out of the headphone jack powering external speakers. ![]() a five-year old machine- so I have to assume the problem lies with the software. (A huge step forward, however, was disabling the "headphone limiter" setting.) I can't imagine that the hardware is inherently inferior in the W520 (?)- vs. I've spent a lot of time tweaking the settings in both the Smart Audio applet- frankly one of the worst interfaces I've ever seen for controlling a device- as well as the Windows audio settings, and I've still be unable to at least match the loudness of the T60p sound card. I like to use external speakers through a receiver via the line out, and the output signal seems significantly weaker than that with the T60p. In making the transition from my beloved T60p to the W520, I've been pretty astounded at the poor audio quality of the newer machine. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |